<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jim DeMint&#8217;s Phony Federalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jennqpublic.com/jim-demints-phony-federalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jennqpublic.com/jim-demints-phony-federalism/</link>
	<description>one part reason, two parts awesome</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:25:54 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jenn Q. Public</title>
		<link>http://www.jennqpublic.com/jim-demints-phony-federalism/comment-page-1/#comment-8885</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn Q. Public</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 04:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jennqpublic.com/?p=1790#comment-8885</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t demand ideological purity, but a little consistency would be nice. Situational federalism just doesn&#039;t cut it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t demand ideological purity, but a little consistency would be nice. Situational federalism just doesn&#8217;t cut it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracy Coyle</title>
		<link>http://www.jennqpublic.com/jim-demints-phony-federalism/comment-page-1/#comment-8884</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy Coyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 03:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jennqpublic.com/?p=1790#comment-8884</guid>
		<description>I talk to &quot;C&quot;onservatives all the time that shout from the rooftops their commitment to Federalism and individual rights....right up until an individual decides to marry someone of the same sex..then Federalism and individual rights are secondary to the STATE, to SOCIETY, to the Majority.

Drives me crazy they don&#039;t see the problem....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I talk to &#8220;C&#8221;onservatives all the time that shout from the rooftops their commitment to Federalism and individual rights&#8230;.right up until an individual decides to marry someone of the same sex..then Federalism and individual rights are secondary to the STATE, to SOCIETY, to the Majority.</p>
<p>Drives me crazy they don&#8217;t see the problem&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
