<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Playboy: Now With More Misogyny!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jennqpublic.com/playboy-now-with-more-misogyny/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jennqpublic.com/playboy-now-with-more-misogyny/</link>
	<description>one part reason, two parts awesome</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:43:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10 Hateful Anti-Woman Acts By Leftist “Feminists,” Part 1 : Jenn Q. Public</title>
		<link>http://www.jennqpublic.com/playboy-now-with-more-misogyny/comment-page-1/#comment-13164</link>
		<dc:creator>10 Hateful Anti-Woman Acts By Leftist “Feminists,” Part 1 : Jenn Q. Public</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 07:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jennqpublic.com/?p=1246#comment-13164</guid>
		<description>[...] rating? &#8216;Worse than f***ing Eva Braun.&#8217;&#8221; He even imagined that Malkin was somehow asking for it: Malkin’s “tight body and get-off-my-lawn stare just scream, ‘Do [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rating? &#8216;Worse than f***ing Eva Braun.&#8217;&#8221; He even imagined that Malkin was somehow asking for it: Malkin’s “tight body and get-off-my-lawn stare just scream, ‘Do [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10 Hateful Anti-Woman Acts by Leftist “Feminists”, Part 1 &#124; RedState</title>
		<link>http://www.jennqpublic.com/playboy-now-with-more-misogyny/comment-page-1/#comment-12977</link>
		<dc:creator>10 Hateful Anti-Woman Acts by Leftist “Feminists”, Part 1 &#124; RedState</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 23:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jennqpublic.com/?p=1246#comment-12977</guid>
		<description>[...] hate f*** rating? ‘Worse than f***ing Eva Braun.’”  He even imagined that Malkin was somehow asking for it: Malkin’s “tight body and get-off-my-lawn stare just scream, ‘Do [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hate f*** rating? ‘Worse than f***ing Eva Braun.’”  He even imagined that Malkin was somehow asking for it: Malkin’s “tight body and get-off-my-lawn stare just scream, ‘Do [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10 Hateful Anti-Woman Acts by Leftist “Feminists”, Part 1 &#171; Snark And Boobs</title>
		<link>http://www.jennqpublic.com/playboy-now-with-more-misogyny/comment-page-1/#comment-12973</link>
		<dc:creator>10 Hateful Anti-Woman Acts by Leftist “Feminists”, Part 1 &#171; Snark And Boobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 23:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jennqpublic.com/?p=1246#comment-12973</guid>
		<description>[...] hate f*** rating? ‘Worse than f***ing Eva Braun.’”  He even imagined that Malkin was somehow asking for it: Malkin’s “tight body and get-off-my-lawn stare just scream, ‘Do [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hate f*** rating? ‘Worse than f***ing Eva Braun.’”  He even imagined that Malkin was somehow asking for it: Malkin’s “tight body and get-off-my-lawn stare just scream, ‘Do [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Greenroom &#187; 10 Hateful Anti-Woman Acts by Leftist “Feminists”, Part 1</title>
		<link>http://www.jennqpublic.com/playboy-now-with-more-misogyny/comment-page-1/#comment-12968</link>
		<dc:creator>The Greenroom &#187; 10 Hateful Anti-Woman Acts by Leftist “Feminists”, Part 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 23:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jennqpublic.com/?p=1246#comment-12968</guid>
		<description>[...] hate f*** rating? ‘Worse than f***ing Eva Braun.’”  He even imagined that Malkin was somehow asking for it: Malkin’s “tight body and get-off-my-lawn stare just scream, ‘Do [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hate f*** rating? ‘Worse than f***ing Eva Braun.’”  He even imagined that Malkin was somehow asking for it: Malkin’s “tight body and get-off-my-lawn stare just scream, ‘Do [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eclectic Radical</title>
		<link>http://www.jennqpublic.com/playboy-now-with-more-misogyny/comment-page-1/#comment-3251</link>
		<dc:creator>Eclectic Radical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jennqpublic.com/?p=1246#comment-3251</guid>
		<description>&quot;Tell me, what religious and moral grounds you can use to attack Michelle Malkin?&quot;

Let&#039;s see... she doesn&#039;t love her neighbor, or at the very least she does not behave in a manner appropriate to the principle of loving thy neighbor as outlined in the Bible. She frequently professes as much hatred (or more) for the sinner than for the sin, except when the sin fits into her prejudiced view of the world. I have not seen evidence of forgiveness or humility in accord with Biblical principles of both in her behavior.

There is also a passage about camels and the eyes of needles that goes unnoticed in the modern interpretation of Calvinist predestinarian thought by many right-wing Christian groups, in the form of prosperity theology, to which Malkin and most other conservative commentators (and far too many American across the board) appear to subscribe: rich people are righteous and poor people are sinners. Such statements are not only too broad to be accurate, but grossly misrepresentative of what Jesus actually said about the rich and the poor.

Just a few examples.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Tell me, what religious and moral grounds you can use to attack Michelle Malkin?&#8221;</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see&#8230; she doesn&#8217;t love her neighbor, or at the very least she does not behave in a manner appropriate to the principle of loving thy neighbor as outlined in the Bible. She frequently professes as much hatred (or more) for the sinner than for the sin, except when the sin fits into her prejudiced view of the world. I have not seen evidence of forgiveness or humility in accord with Biblical principles of both in her behavior.</p>
<p>There is also a passage about camels and the eyes of needles that goes unnoticed in the modern interpretation of Calvinist predestinarian thought by many right-wing Christian groups, in the form of prosperity theology, to which Malkin and most other conservative commentators (and far too many American across the board) appear to subscribe: rich people are righteous and poor people are sinners. Such statements are not only too broad to be accurate, but grossly misrepresentative of what Jesus actually said about the rich and the poor.</p>
<p>Just a few examples.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn Q. Public</title>
		<link>http://www.jennqpublic.com/playboy-now-with-more-misogyny/comment-page-1/#comment-3071</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn Q. Public</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 14:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jennqpublic.com/?p=1246#comment-3071</guid>
		<description>Cindy, thanks for the link!  I&#039;ll update my post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cindy, thanks for the link!  I&#8217;ll update my post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn Q. Public</title>
		<link>http://www.jennqpublic.com/playboy-now-with-more-misogyny/comment-page-1/#comment-3070</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn Q. Public</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 14:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jennqpublic.com/?p=1246#comment-3070</guid>
		<description>USpace, I&#039;m no defender of NOW, but I will give them credit for coming out with a strong statement condemning the Playboy article (though they probably wouldn&#039;t have bothered if Elisabeth Hasselbeck hadn&#039;t pressed them for it.)  But you&#039;re right, the level of outrage would have been entirely different if these were liberal women - you know, &quot;real&quot; women.

One other point on your comment: one reason this was particularly heinous is that Playboy is a mainstream publication that has published the likes of Bill Buckley and Arthur Schlesinger. Hustler is a different animal entirely.  If they did something similar, it would be harder to get worked up into a lather because we don&#039;t really expect better of Hustler.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>USpace, I&#8217;m no defender of NOW, but I will give them credit for coming out with a strong statement condemning the Playboy article (though they probably wouldn&#8217;t have bothered if Elisabeth Hasselbeck hadn&#8217;t pressed them for it.)  But you&#8217;re right, the level of outrage would have been entirely different if these were liberal women &#8211; you know, &#8220;real&#8221; women.</p>
<p>One other point on your comment: one reason this was particularly heinous is that Playboy is a mainstream publication that has published the likes of Bill Buckley and Arthur Schlesinger. Hustler is a different animal entirely.  If they did something similar, it would be harder to get worked up into a lather because we don&#8217;t really expect better of Hustler.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy Frich</title>
		<link>http://www.jennqpublic.com/playboy-now-with-more-misogyny/comment-page-1/#comment-3063</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy Frich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 06:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jennqpublic.com/?p=1246#comment-3063</guid>
		<description>Lost Playboy web feature:
UNEDITED

http://www.redstate.com/absentee/2009/06/02/the-playboy-article-nsfw

I&#039;m posting this filth because it is typical of what the opposition does to conservative females in attempt to silence them.
Brushing it under the rug will prevent us from exposing the creeps.  Stand up to the bullies!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lost Playboy web feature:<br />
UNEDITED</p>
<p><a href="http://www.redstate.com/absentee/2009/06/02/the-playboy-article-nsfw" rel="nofollow">http://www.redstate.com/absentee/2009/06/02/the-playboy-article-nsfw</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m posting this filth because it is typical of what the opposition does to conservative females in attempt to silence them.<br />
Brushing it under the rug will prevent us from exposing the creeps.  Stand up to the bullies!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: USpace</title>
		<link>http://www.jennqpublic.com/playboy-now-with-more-misogyny/comment-page-1/#comment-3062</link>
		<dc:creator>USpace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 05:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jennqpublic.com/?p=1246#comment-3062</guid>
		<description>.
Conservative women are HOTter!  Just imagine the justified &#039;Liberal&#039; outrage if say, &#039;Hustler&#039; Magazine ran a disgusting parody where Rush, Hannity, Beck, Savage and Ann Coulter gang-rape and tickle-torture Katie Couric, the PIAPS,  and then Nancy Pelosi.

Imagine.  The outrage would last for months in the MSM.  There would be calls for firings and boycotts.  NOW would be apoplectic.  Poor little outraged, hypocritical Libs.

:)

absurd thought - 
God of the Universe says
joke about raping women

if they are conservative
EVIL freedom lovers...

.
absurd thought - 
God of the Universe says
sex is the height of evil

so is photography
but not pornography

.
absurd thought -
God of the Universe says
always rape women...

who are conservative
they&#039;re just gender traitors
.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.<br />
Conservative women are HOTter!  Just imagine the justified &#8216;Liberal&#8217; outrage if say, &#8216;Hustler&#8217; Magazine ran a disgusting parody where Rush, Hannity, Beck, Savage and Ann Coulter gang-rape and tickle-torture Katie Couric, the PIAPS,  and then Nancy Pelosi.</p>
<p>Imagine.  The outrage would last for months in the MSM.  There would be calls for firings and boycotts.  NOW would be apoplectic.  Poor little outraged, hypocritical Libs.</p>
<p>:)</p>
<p>absurd thought &#8211;<br />
God of the Universe says<br />
joke about raping women</p>
<p>if they are conservative<br />
EVIL freedom lovers&#8230;</p>
<p>.<br />
absurd thought &#8211;<br />
God of the Universe says<br />
sex is the height of evil</p>
<p>so is photography<br />
but not pornography</p>
<p>.<br />
absurd thought -<br />
God of the Universe says<br />
always rape women&#8230;</p>
<p>who are conservative<br />
they&#8217;re just gender traitors<br />
.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Playboy: Now With More Misogyny! : The New Agenda</title>
		<link>http://www.jennqpublic.com/playboy-now-with-more-misogyny/comment-page-1/#comment-2931</link>
		<dc:creator>Playboy: Now With More Misogyny! : The New Agenda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jennqpublic.com/?p=1246#comment-2931</guid>
		<description>[...] is a slightly edited version of an essay originally published on the Jenn Q. Public blog. The author&#8217;s opinions are her own, not necessarily those of The New Agenda. Playboy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is a slightly edited version of an essay originally published on the Jenn Q. Public blog. The author&#8217;s opinions are her own, not necessarily those of The New Agenda. Playboy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

