Comments on: The Moral Superiority of Chicks with Chicks http://www.jennqpublic.com/the-moral-superiority-of-chicks-with-chicks/ one part reason, two parts awesome Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:43:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2 By: Gaby http://www.jennqpublic.com/the-moral-superiority-of-chicks-with-chicks/comment-page-1/#comment-10547 Gaby Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:31:06 +0000 http://www.jennqpublic.com/?p=2294#comment-10547 Thanks for this info about femivorism. I was really hooked into finishing the paragraphs. Eco-feminist implication.hmm I bet you are right. I appreciate the write up. <a href="http://www.backyardchickensite.com/" rel="nofollow">Chicken coop</a> Thanks for this info about femivorism. I was really hooked into finishing the paragraphs. Eco-feminist implication.hmm I bet you are right. I appreciate the write up.
Chicken coop

]]> By: Gaby http://www.jennqpublic.com/the-moral-superiority-of-chicks-with-chicks/comment-page-1/#comment-10546 Gaby Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:30:51 +0000 http://www.jennqpublic.com/?p=2294#comment-10546 LOL. I got such a laugh with that image of Don Juan meeting Leatherface. Sounds pretty much of mind reading or just coincidence? It’s such a great read. <a href="http://www.backyardchickensite.com/" rel="nofollow">Backyard Chicken</a> LOL. I got such a laugh with that image of Don Juan meeting Leatherface. Sounds pretty much of mind reading or just coincidence? It’s such a great read.
Backyard Chicken

]]> By: Jenn Q. Public http://www.jennqpublic.com/the-moral-superiority-of-chicks-with-chicks/comment-page-1/#comment-10544 Jenn Q. Public Tue, 30 Mar 2010 04:23:59 +0000 http://www.jennqpublic.com/?p=2294#comment-10544 DodiaFae, isn't it telling that they feel the need to justify their choice at all? These women are all for choice as long as you're making the right choice for the right reasons. DodiaFae, isn’t it telling that they feel the need to justify their choice at all? These women are all for choice as long as you’re making the right choice for the right reasons.

]]> By: DodiaFae http://www.jennqpublic.com/the-moral-superiority-of-chicks-with-chicks/comment-page-1/#comment-10539 DodiaFae Mon, 29 Mar 2010 18:23:54 +0000 http://www.jennqpublic.com/?p=2294#comment-10539 Um... why should any woman have to justify being a stay-at-home mother? IMO, it's the "feminist" movement that has made women feel they have to justify it. I'd love to be able to keep chickens. They're great for keeping garden pests under control. The fresh eggs are delicious, and nothing beats a BBQ chicken leg that was still walking around yesterday. The reasons I don't: Living in a suburb with a tiny yard makes it very unpractical. Also, unlike these "femivores", I can't afford to pay someone else to take care of them if I want to go away for a day or 10. Chickens are like dogs... you can't leave them for an entire day and expect them to not have destroyed your yard when you get back. You can't expect them to not have been snatched up by the neighborhood hawks, cats, or escaped large dog. I'm curious to know how many of these "femivores" do pay someone else to care for their farm animals... or even their children. Um… why should any woman have to justify being a stay-at-home mother? IMO, it’s the “feminist” movement that has made women feel they have to justify it.

I’d love to be able to keep chickens. They’re great for keeping garden pests under control. The fresh eggs are delicious, and nothing beats a BBQ chicken leg that was still walking around yesterday.

The reasons I don’t: Living in a suburb with a tiny yard makes it very unpractical. Also, unlike these “femivores”, I can’t afford to pay someone else to take care of them if I want to go away for a day or 10. Chickens are like dogs… you can’t leave them for an entire day and expect them to not have destroyed your yard when you get back. You can’t expect them to not have been snatched up by the neighborhood hawks, cats, or escaped large dog.

I’m curious to know how many of these “femivores” do pay someone else to care for their farm animals… or even their children.

]]>