<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I Don&#8217;t Link To Wikipedia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jennqpublic.com/why-i-dont-link-to-wikipedia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jennqpublic.com/why-i-dont-link-to-wikipedia/</link>
	<description>one part reason, two parts awesome</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:25:54 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.jennqpublic.com/why-i-dont-link-to-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-10742</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 06:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jennqpublic.com/?p=1951#comment-10742</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t get me started on crapopedia 
&quot;Verifiability, not truth&quot;

That resumes it all.

Rob Taylor: you nailed it. Couldn&#039;t agree more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t get me started on crapopedia<br />
&#8220;Verifiability, not truth&#8221;</p>
<p>That resumes it all.</p>
<p>Rob Taylor: you nailed it. Couldn&#8217;t agree more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Sarah Palin Denounce Joseph Farah and the Birthers? : Jenn Q. Public</title>
		<link>http://www.jennqpublic.com/why-i-dont-link-to-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-9695</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Sarah Palin Denounce Joseph Farah and the Birthers? : Jenn Q. Public</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 07:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jennqpublic.com/?p=1951#comment-9695</guid>
		<description>[...] this week, I wrote about my refusal to link to Wikipedia because it uses &#8220;verifiability, not truth&#8221; as a standard for assessing the value of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this week, I wrote about my refusal to link to Wikipedia because it uses &#8220;verifiability, not truth&#8221; as a standard for assessing the value of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn Q. Public</title>
		<link>http://www.jennqpublic.com/why-i-dont-link-to-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-9651</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn Q. Public</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 20:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jennqpublic.com/?p=1951#comment-9651</guid>
		<description>DodiaFae, that&#039;s disturbing, but I&#039;m not surprised. Many groups use Wikipedia as part of their public relations strategy, so why not pro-pedophile activists?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DodiaFae, that&#8217;s disturbing, but I&#8217;m not surprised. Many groups use Wikipedia as part of their public relations strategy, so why not pro-pedophile activists?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DodiaFae</title>
		<link>http://www.jennqpublic.com/why-i-dont-link-to-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-9647</link>
		<dc:creator>DodiaFae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jennqpublic.com/?p=1951#comment-9647</guid>
		<description>I became painfully aware of how false much of the information on Wikipedia was when I learned that pro-pedophile activists are rampant, editing entries such as &quot;child sexuality&quot; in an effort to further their own perverse agenda.  

These issues *appear* to have been cleaned up to an extent, but I haven&#039;t had the chance to follow-up more thoroughly more recently.

I still wouldn&#039;t trust it as a resource.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I became painfully aware of how false much of the information on Wikipedia was when I learned that pro-pedophile activists are rampant, editing entries such as &#8220;child sexuality&#8221; in an effort to further their own perverse agenda.  </p>
<p>These issues *appear* to have been cleaned up to an extent, but I haven&#8217;t had the chance to follow-up more thoroughly more recently.</p>
<p>I still wouldn&#8217;t trust it as a resource.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.jennqpublic.com/why-i-dont-link-to-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-9627</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 08:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jennqpublic.com/?p=1951#comment-9627</guid>
		<description>Wikipedia is a symptom of a larger problem. Western schooling from elementary through higher education is nothing more than indoctrinating people into finding consensus rather than truth. More kids these days can spurt out anti-Colonialist talking points than they can facts about the tribes and people they romanticize. More kids have learned to tell you what&#039;s good for the environment then have learned why anything is either good or bad for any environment.

We&#039;ve moved the education system from a place for questioning and debate into a place to hear the opinions that are popular. Wikipedia reflects our cultural indifference to the idea of real knowledge and the effort it takes to attain it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wikipedia is a symptom of a larger problem. Western schooling from elementary through higher education is nothing more than indoctrinating people into finding consensus rather than truth. More kids these days can spurt out anti-Colonialist talking points than they can facts about the tribes and people they romanticize. More kids have learned to tell you what&#8217;s good for the environment then have learned why anything is either good or bad for any environment.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve moved the education system from a place for questioning and debate into a place to hear the opinions that are popular. Wikipedia reflects our cultural indifference to the idea of real knowledge and the effort it takes to attain it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: demigoth</title>
		<link>http://www.jennqpublic.com/why-i-dont-link-to-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-9626</link>
		<dc:creator>demigoth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 07:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jennqpublic.com/?p=1951#comment-9626</guid>
		<description>Just two reasons?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just two reasons?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paratha</title>
		<link>http://www.jennqpublic.com/why-i-dont-link-to-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-9625</link>
		<dc:creator>Paratha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 07:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jennqpublic.com/?p=1951#comment-9625</guid>
		<description>Citing Wikipedia is lazy because you could just cite the original source and verify the information to the best fo your abilty. I also would not do it because you don&#039;t know if the information will be the same the next day. People vandalise the wiki for fun. It isn&#039;t reliable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Citing Wikipedia is lazy because you could just cite the original source and verify the information to the best fo your abilty. I also would not do it because you don&#8217;t know if the information will be the same the next day. People vandalise the wiki for fun. It isn&#8217;t reliable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
